Test Report
Testing Scope
The scope of testing is to verify fitment to the specification from the perspective of
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
Verification is performed not only from the end user perspective but also from the System Integrator (SI) point of view. Hence, the Configurability and Extensibility of the software are also assessed. This ensures the readiness of the software for use in multiple countries. MOSIP is an “API First” product platform.
The testing scope has been focused on the following features:
Inji Home page
Issuer and Credential selection
Authenticating with user credentials
PDF Generation and Auto Download
Success/Failure notification after downloading the VC PDF
Retrieve Issuers and Credential list
Downloading VC
Multi-language support
Error Handling
Theme update
PDF View
Issuers support
Responsive view of the web
Access violations
QR Code
Durian data storage integration
PDF and CBOR
Log in with Google
OpenID4VP Implementation
Latest draft changes support for OpenID4VCI
FAQ Support
UI UX Design updates
Swagger update
Secure Time-Bound Storage
Locale Support
PDF Template Support
Authorization endpoint discovery through the auth server's well-known
SD JWT support
Passcode Reset
Test Approach
A personal-based approach has been adopted to perform the IV&V by simulating test scenarios that resemble a real-time implementation.
A Persona is a fictional character/user profile created to represent a user type that might use a product/or a service in a similar way. Persona-based testing is a software testing technique that puts software testers in the customer's shoes, assesses their needs from the software and thereby determines use cases/scenarios that the customers will execute. The persona's needs may be addressed through any of the following.
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
The verification methods may differ based on how the need was addressed.
Verified configuration
Verification is performed on various configurations as mentioned below
Default configuration - with 7 Lang
English
French
Arabic
Hindi
Tamil
Kannada
Portuguese
The UI will render in all the above languages, but the PDF file after download will only be in English language as Certify is currently only supporting English. When any language is selected in UI, as a fallback, the PDF will be in English.
Feature Health

Test execution statistics
Functional test results
Below are the test metrics for performing functional testing. The process followed was black box testing, which was based on the specifications of the software component under test. Functional test was performed in combination of individual module testing as well as integration testing. Test data were prepared in line with the user stories. Expected results were monitored by examining the user interface. The coverage includes GUI testing, System testing, and End-To-End flows across multiple configurations. The testing cycle included the simulation of multiple identity schemas and respective UI schema configurations.
Total
Passed
Failed
NA
823
745
78
0
Test Rate: 100%, Pass Rate: 90%
UI Automation and API Test Rig test results
Below are the test metrics by performing UI Automation and API Test rig:
344
307
0
37
Test Rate: 83%, Pass Rate: 100%
Here is the detailed breakdown of metrics for each module: Inji Web UI Automation
Total
28
Passed
28
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Inji Web API Test Rig
Total
316
Passed
279
Failed
0
Skipped/Ignored
33
Known Issues
4
Note: Ignored 33 OTP related test cases which are descoped and not applicable. For the known Issues, we have bugs added in the xls report.
The functional and test rig code base branch, which is used for the above metric, is:
UI Automation: 9adaa889
API automation: 286b73fc
Detailed Test Metrics
Below are the detailed test metrics by performing manual/automation testing. The project metrics are derived from Defect density, Test coverage, Test execution coverage, test tracking and efficiency.
The various metrics that assist in test tracking and efficiency are as follows:
Passed Test Cases Coverage: It measures the percentage of passed test cases. (Number of tests passed / Total number of tests executed) x 100
Failed Test Case Coverage: It measures the percentage of all the failed test cases. (Number of failed tests / Total number of test cases executed) x 100
Github link for the detailed report is here
Last updated
Was this helpful?