Test Report

Introduction

The scope of testing is to verify fitment to the specification from the perspective of Functionality, Configurability and Customizability. Verification is performed not only from the end-user perspective but also from the System Integrator (SI) point of view. Hence, the Configurability and Extensibility of the software are also assessed. This ensures the readiness of the software for use in multiple countries and diverse identity ecosystems.

Overview and Scope

  • Home Page

  • Upload Feature

  • Scan Feature

  • VP Verification

  • OVP Flow

  • SVG Support

  • Multi Language

  • Same Device and Cross Device flow

Test Approach

The Functional verification of the Inji verify application is performed on Android and iOS platforms to ensure alignment with product specifications and business requirements. Analyzed with respect to functional stability, data integrity, and UI consistency. The validation adopts a persona-based testing strategy, simulating real-world user scenarios across diverse device matrices and multi-language configurations to ensure robustness in both online and offline environments.

  • Functionality

  • Combination

  • Configurability

  • Customizability

  • Library verification (vc-verifier)

Test Organization

Name
Functional Role
Responsibilities

Santosh

QA Engineer

Verifying the functionality, stability of the application,and report preparation. and performing combination testing.

Chaitanya K

QA Manager

Overviewing the test execution and review of the report.

Ragini Krishna

Senior QA Manager

High-level governance and executive reviews of reports and execution.

Test Organization

Test Planning

  • Data Readiness: Validate the availability of all services along with configured identity schemas (UIN/VID) to support biometric and authentication flows.

  • Data Strategy: Refresh test data for every cycle by generating new QR codes.

  • Coverage Distribution: Execute test scenarios across a broad matrix of browsers on Windows, Android, and iOS devices, spanning multiple user personas to ensure end-to-end compatibility coverage.

Test Devices

Device Model
OS and BLE version

iPhone 7

iOS 15.8 BLE 4.2

iPhone 11

iOS 26.1 BLE 5.0

iPhone 13

iOS 18.6.2 BLE 5.0

iPhone 14

iOS 26.2 BLE 5.3

SS Galaxy A03 core

Android 11 BLE 4.2

Vivo Y73

Android 13 BLE 5.0

Redmi 6A

Android 9 BLE 4.2

Techno POVA 6 NEO

Android 14 BLE 5.0

OPPO A59 5G

Android 13 BLE 5.3

ONE PLUS 12R

Android 15 BLE 5.3

Infinix NOTE 50X 5G

Android 15 BLE 5.4

Redmi 7A

Android 10 BLE 4.2

iTel

Android 14 BLE 5.0

Xiaomi Redmi NOTE 13 Pro

Android 15 BLE 5.2

Test Devices

Browser Versions

Used the below browser versions in testing INJI Verify

  • Chrome: Version 123.0.6312.124

  • Firefox: Version 125.0.1

  • Edge: Version 124.0.2478.51

  • Safari : Version 17

Test Environment

Images (qa-inji1 env)

mosipqa/inji-verify-service:0.16.x

mosipqa/inji-verify-ui:0.16.x

mosipqa/inji-certify-with-plugins:0.13.x

mosipid/apitest-mimoto:0.20.0

mosipqa/mimoto:develop

mosipqa/inji-web:develop

Test Environment

Images (released env)

mosipid/mimoto:0.20.0

mosipid/apitest-mimoto:0.20.0

mosipid/inji-verify-service:0.15.2

mosipid/inji-verify-ui:0.15.2

mosipid/inji-certify-with-plugins:0.13.1

mosipid/inji-web:0.15.0

mosipid/esignet-with-plugins:1.6.2

mosipid/authentication-service:1.2.1.0

mosipid/authentication-internal-service:1.2.1.0

mosipid/authentication-otp-service:1.2.1.0

mosipid/kernel-notification-service:1.2.0.1

mosipid/registration-processor-stage-group-1:1.2.1.1

Test Environment

Test Execution Report

Test case execution summary

Platform
Total
Pass
Fail
Skip

INJI Verify

953

857

96

0

Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 90%

Test Execution Summary

Combination Testing with device components

This section details Combination Testing results for Inji-verify on Windows, Android and iOS, specifically validating workflows like sharing Verifiable Credentials (VCs) across devices. These tests confirm the application's stability when orchestrating multiple components such as Bluetooth, camera, and biometrics during these cross-platform interactions.

Total
Passed
Failed
Skip

220

197

23

0

Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 89.54%

Combination Result

Automation INJI Verify UI

Total
Pass
Fail
Known Issues
Ignored

23

23

0

0

0

Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 100%

UI Automation

Automation INJI Verify API

Total
Pass
Fail
Known Issues
Ignored

35

35

0

0

0

Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 100%

API Automation Result

Defect Metrics

Defect Metrics for the Release 0.16.0

The following table depicts only the bugs which are found and not addressed in the current release.

Blocker
Critical
Major
Minor
Total

0

0

8

5

13

Defect Metrics for the Release

Known Issues Metrics

This section focuses on a separate category of issues that are known but not addressed in the current release. It provides a count and severity distribution for these defects across releases.

Blocker
Critical
Major
Minor
Total

0

0

47

13

60

Defect Metrics for the known issues

Conclusion

This section summarizes the key findings of test execution. It also provides a final QA recommendation on the build's readiness for release. The functional verification for Inji-verify version 016.0 has been successfully completed. The testing cycle achieved a 100% execution rate with a 90% pass rate across a total of 953 test cases. Additionally, API automation achieved a 100% pass rate.

While there are 13 open defects (0 Critical, 8 Major, 5 Minor) and 60 known issues in total, there are zero blocker defects identified. The application has demonstrated functional stability and data integrity consistent with product specifications.

QA Approval

The build has successfully met the defined exit criteria and is recommended for release. The approval is based on the following satisfied conditions:

  • Test Case Execution Completion: 100% of planned scenarios executed.

  • Defect Status: No Blocker defects remain open.

  • Documentation Sign-off: All test artifacts and reports are finalized.

  • Test Environment Stability: The test environment remained stable throughout the execution cycle.

Name
Functional Role
Responsibilities

Chaitanya K

QA Manager

Ragini Krishna

Senior QA Manager

Report is signed off details

Appendix

This includes additional reference information for the report. It contains a history of document versions and a list of acronyms and their meanings.

Appendix A: Versions

Version
Date
Author
Reviewers

V1.0

10/12/2025

Santosh

Chaitanya K

Ragini Krishna

Document History

It outlines the strategy used to ensure a comprehensive evaluation.

Version
Author
Date
Review
Affected Sections

V1.0

Santhosh

17/12/2025

  1. Chaitanya Kesiraju

  2. Ragini Krishna

New Document

Last updated

Was this helpful?