Test Report
Testing Scope
The scope of testing is to verify fitment to the specification from the perspective of
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
Verification is performed not only from the end user perspective but also from the System Integrator (SI) point of view. Hence Configurability and Extensibility of the software is also assessed. This ensures the readiness of software for use in multiple countries.
The Inji testing scope revolves around the following flows:
Biometric unlock
Passcodes unlock
VC download via MOSIP
VC download via e-signet
VC downloads via Sunbird
Pinning a VC
Normal VC sharing with VID
Deleting VC
Face Auth on Resident's phone with VID
Multi language support
Credential registry
Backup and restore
Wallet binding
Deep link navigation
OpenID4VP
QR code Login
Key Management
Logout
Test Approach
Persona based approach has been adopted to perform the IV&V, by simulating test scenarios that resemble real-time implementation.
A Persona is a fictional character/user profile created to represent a user type that might use a product/or a service in a similar way. Persona based testing is a software testing technique that puts software testers in the customer's shoes, assesses their needs from the software and thereby determines use cases/scenarios that the customers will execute. The persona needs may be addressed through any of the following.
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
The verification methods may differ based on how the need was addressed.
Verified configuration
Verification is performed on various configurations as mentioned below
Default configuration - with 1 Lang\
Feature Health


Test execution statistics
Functional test results by modules
Below are the test metrics by performing functional testing using mock MDS and mock ABIS. The process followed was black box testing which based its test cases on the specifications of the software component under test. The functional test was performed in combination with individual module testing as well as integration testing. Test data were prepared in line with the user stories. Expected results were monitored by examining the user interface. The coverage includes GUI testing, System testing, End-To-End flows across multiple languages and configurations. The testing cycle included simulation of multiple identity schema and respective UI schema configurations.
3718
3359
359
0
Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 90%
** Here is the detailed breakdown of metrics for each module**:
On Android Device
Total
1946
Passed
1768
Failed
178
Skipped (N/A)
0
On iOS Device
Total
1772
Passed
1591
Failed
181
Skipped (N/A)
0
Testing with various device combinations
Below are the test metrics by performing VC Sharing functionality on various device combinations

192
179
13
0
Test Rate: 100% With Pass Rate: 93.22%
Device and Component Details:
Tested Components
QA Environment (qa-inji1
)
qa-inji1
)mosipqa/inji-verify-service:0.13.x
mosipqa/inji-verify-ui:0.13.x
mosipqa/inji-certify-with-plugins:develop
mosipid/apitest-mimoto:0.17.1
mosipqa/mimoto:develop
mosipqa/inji-web:0.13.x
Released Environment
mosipid/apitest-mimoto:0.17.1
mosipid/apitest-mimoto:0.17.1
mosipid/inji-verify-service:0.12.3
mosipid/inji-verify-ui:0.12.3
mosipid/inji-certify-with-plugins:0.11.0
mosipid/inji-web:0.12.0
mosipid/esignet-with-plugins:1.5.1
mosipid/authentication-service:1.2.1.0
mosipid/authentication-internal-service:1.2.1.0
mosipid/authentication-otp-service:1.2.1.0
mosipid/kernel-notification-service:1.2.0.1
mosipid/registration-processor-stage-group-1:1.2.1.1
Devices Used for Testing
Vivo Y73
Android 13
5.0
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Android 11
4.2
iPhone 11
iOS 18.3.2
5.0
iPhone 8
iOS 16.7
5.0
iPhone 7
iOS 15.8
4.2
Redmi 7A
Android 10
4.2
Redmi Note 10 Lite
Android 13
5.0
Redmi K20 Pro
Android 13
5.0
Redmi 6A
Android 9
4.2
Italicized device names indicate devices used for specific compatibility or regression testing.
Detailed Test Metrics
Below are the detailed test metrics by performing manual testing. The project metrics are derived from Defect density, Test coverage, Test execution coverage, test tracking and efficiency.
The various metrics that assist in test tracking and efficiency are as follows:
Passed Test Cases Coverage: It measures the percentage of passed test cases. (Number of tests passed / Total number of tests executed) x 100
Failed Test Case Coverage: It measures the percentage of all failed test cases. (Number of failed tests / Total number of test cases executed) x 100
Execution Test Summary
Well known and wallet metadata story verification was performed against the qa-inji1 env.
Other story verification performed against released env.
Last updated
Was this helpful?